Very thorough and informative reading of the Riley decision. If you are not familiar with this ruling, it is the Supreme Court decision that searches of your phone if arrested are not permissible without a warrant. This piece gives several forceful reasons why this is a good ruling for privacy advocates (not a sentence one types too often!). Note the geolocational privacy implications this gives rise to.
Do ‘robots… on CFP: Robotic futures (AAG… Do ‘robots… on CFP: Robotic futures (AAG… Preliminary Proposal… on New spatial media nick lally // art, g… on CFP: Robotic futures (AAG… dmf on Surveillance capitalism?
- Great sentiment from Alison Gopnik! newyorker.com/magazine/2016/… via @newyorker https://t.co/EVCgfWIRAh 17 hours ago
- RT @kgosztola: A CIA-backed coup twitter.com/AP_Archive/sta… 1 day ago
- Just to say a whole gallery for Ladybird books... reading.ac.uk/TheMERL/Visit-… Well done @TheMERL & @uniofreading 2 days ago
- @jonorcup Someone please buy me this one! https://t.co/LhyMBIdeOP 2 days ago
- Have to say I remember the Ladybird How to Read books growing up! Exciting new words at foot of every page theguardian.com/books/2017/feb… 2 days ago